I should have used one.

‽

This site has it.

Yes, I’m fully aware that CNET owns this image. I’m not using it for profit, so don’t worry, and their damn watermark is still up there. Although, CNET, next time why not put it in a place it’s not so easily removable?

Attention - seeming as mine is of the same calibre as a small monkey, I have decided to start in a different direction on this site. Reviews are forthcoming, may be poorly written and will give your dog diabetes.

So, listen up. Which you won’t, because you don’t care about another one of the billions of blogs. Not that I care either, I’m doing this for no reason at all other than to appease my conscience that I’m not wasting another day not doing this or anything else for that reason; my, that sentence was long.

Better than the first in every imaginable way, and considering the first was one of the best games on PS3, that makes R2 pretty damned incredible.

“If I am buying a tartiflette to share among my famished children, I will pay 25% more than last year. If that isn’t the very definition of national humiliation, I don’t know what is.”

- Boris Johnson

It’s good, but it’s no Captain MacMillan.

If you find yourself with an extra £40 this autumn, you could do a lot worse than pick up a copy of Mercenaries 2 (but for christ’s sake, avoid the PS2 version). The PS3 version, for example, is a cracker of a game , and not just because you get paid for levelling cities. Sometime in November it’s set to become even better with some DLC, including two very interesting new playable characters:

Yes, that it Democratic U.S. Presidential nominee Barack Obama, and Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin. Yes, you can blow up tanks and hijack helicopters dressed as them. No, Ralph Nader isn’t involved.

Badgers.

Badgers.

Badgers!

They’re so awesome

Badgers

Yeah.

We’re all just holograms in someone’s sick game of Universe™: The Reckoning™ (Out now for £24.99 with a special edition Universe™ Poster!).

It has come to my attention that despite two different people contribute to this blog, YOU, the viewer, don’t who who wrote what. This may present a problem in the future, since one of us may say something a bit controversial and you may want to make fun of our names in a passive-agressive comment. But fear not! Here is the easy-peasy guide to telling me and Sarm apart:

Sarm’s writing style: Informative, factual, use of logic and criticism of the fallicious logic of others.

My writing style: Angry, impulsive, calls at least two people an idiot per post, drenched with hyperbole.

Sarm’s tags: Relevant to the post.

My tags: Tenuous link to post, usuallyan obscure pop-culture reference.

Sarm’s topics: Trivia, science, technology, quotes, politics, the internet

My topics: Videogames.

So there you go! Guess who wrote what on this blog and you could win absolutely bugger all!